As a Game & Monetization Consultant at NativeX, I’m constantly playing mobile games. I try to play every game that pops up in the Top 100 free and grossing charts but I’ve been struggling to do that on top of all my other responsibilities. As I was doing this, I started seeing similarities between games so I decided to only play one game of a particular idea. One of the more recent and obvious ones is all the “4 pics 1 word” games. I certainly don’t need to play more than one of those types of games unless I’m doing a personal study on them like slot and trading card games last year.
What it did right
Art & Sounds
Varying gameplay mechanics
Ok so I don’t usually call it cheating. I normally say it’s a clever use of in game mechanics. Anyways, if a game can be played offline, players can normally move the local time on the device forward to reduce long wait times. However, when you do this in MWCF the developer has some timestamp check and displays the below message. Players lose all their current doughnuts, and in my case, added 50-some hours on all of my cars and shops. I wasn’t mad about it. I actually thought it was funny.
What could be improved
This is completely subjective, but I think the name could’ve been something easier to remember. I’ve got the name down now because I’ve been talking about it for the past month, but I could never remember the name the first week or two. I would tell people to play some Car World/Car Factory/Motor Car game. Why couldn’t it just be Motor World or Car Factory? Something shorter?
On the other hand Motor World might be part of a long term strategy and the developer is planning out several games under this overarching name. (e.g. Motor World: Drag Race or Motor World: Car Battles)
I really like questing and missions in games. It gives the player some kind of motivation to keep playing. MWCF has missions and they’re grouped in sets of three, but I only completed 4 or 5 sets of missions before they greatly increased in difficulty or time needed in order to complete the missions. I think these should’ve been less difficult to accomplish to give players a sense of accomplishment while players worked on shops/cars with really long build times.
I also wouldn’t mind racing more often, but what if I don’t have friends to race with? I’m not about to spam all my friends to play a game to experience this, when I could race the AI in missions.
UI when building
Perhaps this was intentional (to make users hit the speed up button), but the speed up button and arrow to add more workers are on top of each other. I don’t think you actually need to click the arrow to add more workers, but it’s common player behavior to tap the arrow and if I click on the car half of the time it opens a menu for that worker. Obviously this hasn’t stopped me from playing but I do get annoyed that it’s this difficult to do a simple task of adding more workers. Couldn’t they be off centered? Maybe that drives UX designers nuts? Maybe this was tested and it looked bad or didn’t work with multiple cars in the production line. I know it’s minor but I’m probably not the only one.
Longevity… a little light on cars
Technically perhaps the missions are endless, but there’s a definite end to the content/cars and it’s maybe a little light in my opinion. I’m working on a couple more cars, but then I’ll be done. I won’t invite enough players to get that car, I already purchased over 20 mystery cards and only got 1 car so I won’t get the rest of the mystery card cars and I can’t breed any more cards to get new plans. I understand it’s easy for me to criticize the amount of cars from the outside because this could’ve been a large undertaking for the developer, but in an ideal world you’ll have maybe 92 cars at launch and then 1 month later release an update with maybe another 30 cars to let players know that you’re updating and frequently. It doesn’t matter how frequent, but giving the perception of content updates is arguably more important than actually following through.
I’ve had a good run with MWCF at 1 month and spending $15, but I’m getting close to churning.
Not compelled to spend $100
Although some make the claim, it’s not evil to make F2P games that people want to spend money in. I’m paying for entertainment and happy to do so. Don’t confuse this with preying on “whales” to make a living. I’ve spent $15 and would do it again. However, I’ve reached the point where I won’t spend anymore. I think what is lacking is something with incredible value that’s incredibly expensive or difficult to obtain. I could spend $100 and buy one of the ‘elite workers’ but I don’t really need it against a group of engineers. I could also buy more mystery cards but I’m sick of getting cards with less than 1,000 coins or experience. 70+% of cards have been a rip off since they didn’t grant awards that were at my level (50+). If the experience or coins were worth a value that was at my level then maybe it wouldn’t feel like such a rip off for spending hard currency.
All-in-all I think the game is great, and would certainly tell the developer the same. The pros certainly outweigh the cons, and some of the constructive feedback is minor or subjective so I couldn’t say with 100% certainty that improving these areas would lead to positive changing in metrics. A/B testing would tell if they’re good suggestions or not. I just felt compelled to write observations with the game because I spent a good deal of time playing it.
If you’d like to talk about this or any other games look for more on the NativeX blog, or follow me on Twitter.
Leave a comment
What does programmatic advertising look like in China?
Kevin Ford - November 21st, 2019
The programmatic advertising landscape in China lags behind North America’s, but it’s catching up thanks to the growth in the […]Read More >
A Fraude de Anúncios e Aplicativos na Escala Global Está Piorando. Aqui Vai uma Explicação do Que É, e Como Vencê-la!
Kevin Ford - November 12th, 2019
A fraude publicitária pode chegar aos 30 biliões de dólares este ano. A fraude em anúncios digitais é difícil […]Read More >